DeepL
AI WritingPlan gratisBest-in-class translation for European languages, with glossaries.
Visit siteBest AI Writing tools: 3 tested
3 tools listed, 3 with a free tier. Conclusions come from hands-on testing plus user ratings; prices are public list prices, last checked 2026-10.
All AI Writing tools 3
Topic
Grammarly
AI WritingPlan gratisReal-time grammar, tone and clarity suggestions across every app you type in.
Visit site
WPS AI
AI WritingPlan gratisOffice-compatible suite with AI, strongest at Chinese document formats.
Visit siteHow to choose
If you only pick one, take DeepL (4.8/5): On morphologically rich languages such as German, French and Dutch, DeepL remains a tier a…
Need free → DeepL; budget-first → WPS AI; China-direct access → WPS AI.
Top 5 at a glance 3
| Rank | Tool | Score | Free tier | From | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepL | 4.8 | Yes | Pro €8.74/mo+ | Teams working with Europea… |
| 2 | Grammarly | 4.6 | Yes | Premium $12/mo | Professionals writing Engl… |
| 3 | WPS AI | 4.3 | Yes | Membership ¥89/yr | Admin and finance teams wo… |
FAQ
Which AI Writing tool should I start with?
Highest rated is DeepL (4.8/5 across 1960 reviews). On morphologically rich languages such as German, French and Dutch, De… If budget is zero, validate your flow on its free tier first.
Are there free options in this category?
3 of the 3 tools listed offer a long-term free tier; most others run a 7–14 day trial. Free tiers usually cap seats, export formats or quotas — rarely the core editing features.
Which is easier for teams in mainland China?
1 of 3 are verified reachable from mainland China. If you need local invoicing, data residency or Chinese support, pick from those 1 — lowest migration cost.
How often is pricing re-checked?
We re-check public pricing monthly; the latest update was WPS AI in 2026-10. Always confirm on the vendor's checkout page — the "from" price shown is the annual plan divided by twelve.
Other categories
Last verified 2026-10-01. Scores weigh hands-on testing (60%), price-to-value (25%) and user ratings (15%). Vendors neither score nor buy placement.